|
Type of risk measure
|
Advantages
|
Comments
|
Comments 2
|
Sharpe Ratio
|
Total Risk
|
|
Assumes normally
distributed returns, based on the CAPM, slope of the CML
|
Biased upwards for
hedge funds
Uses portfolio total
risk instead of systematic risk
|
Sortino Ratio
|
Total Risk
|
Good for hedge funds
Good for assets with
skewed distribution of returns
|
Improves on the Sharpe
Ratio that penalizes for good performance which is incorporated in the up
side deviation
|
|
Information Ratio
(Appraisal Ratio)
|
Total Risk
|
Used to measure
active performance of mutual funds
|
Higher information
ratio (0.4-0.6) is considered better. The index has zero IR
|
IR = active return/active
risk
IR = IC x BR ^ (0.5)
|
Jensen’s alpha
|
Systematic
|
Used frequently to
evaluate mutual fund performance
|
Based on the CAPM
|
|
Treynor
|
Systematic
|
Overcomes the Sharpe
ratio limitation that it uses total risk
|
Slope of the SML
|
|
M squared
|
Total Risk
|
The Sharpe ratio is
awkward to interpret when it is a negative value. M squared is always
positive.
|
A skillful manager
will generate an M2 greater than the return on the market
|
Rf + SR of asset x
Market STD. M^2 measure ranks in agreement with the Sharpe ratio
|
Monday, June 4, 2018
Portfolio Performance Evaluation Risk/Return Measures
Labels:
alpha,
cfa,
information ratio,
jensen,
m squared,
sharpe ratio,
sortino
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment